|
|
Robotic surgery techniques to approach benign prostatic hyperplasia disease: A comprehensive literature review and the state of art |
Marcio Covas Moschovasa,b,1,,*(),Frederico Timóteob,1,Leonardo Linsb,Oséas de Castro Nevesb,Kulthe Ramesh Seetharam Bhata,Vipul R. Patela
|
a Department of Robotic Surgery, AdventHealth Global Robotics Institute, FL, USA b Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, São Paulo, Brazil |
|
|
Abstract Objective: The robotic-assisted approach to simple prostatectomy (RASP) was conceived, essentially reproducing the fundaments of open simple prostatectomy. Since the first report, RASP underwent several technical modifications. The study aims to identify and describe the current robotic surgery techniques to approach benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Methods: The paper performed a non-systematic literature review accessing PubMed and Embase databases for all full-text articles published from 2008 to May 2020, assessing robot-assisted surgical techniques for BPH treatment using the terms “robot-assisted simple prostatectomy” OR “robotic simple prostatectomy” OR “RASP” AND “surgical technique”. Results: After careful review of 180 studies in PubMed and 198 in Embase, 16 papers reporting different RASP techniques. After the first procedure described by Sotelo et al. [9], several authors contributed to the development of the RASP technique. John et al. [24] proposed the extraperitoneal access, and Yuh et al. [23] first reported the adenoma transcapsular dissection. Some modifications were proposed by Coelho et al. [31] on trigonization, posterior reconstruction, and urethro-vesical anastomosis. Other groups focused on urethral-preserving procedures. Moschovas et al. [28] and Clavijo et al. [32] recently described an intrafascial RASP with the removal of the entire prostatic tissue. Finally, Kaouk et al. [29] reported the feasibility and safety of the da Vinci Single Port approach. Conclusion: In the last eighteen years, the robotic-assisted approach to BPH disease has been evolved, and different techniques have been described. This review details all the technical developments on RASP that distinctive groups have proposed since the multiport robotic platforms until the new da Vinci Single Port.
|
Received: 27 May 2020
Available online: 20 January 2021
|
Corresponding Authors:
Marcio Covas Moschovas
E-mail: marcio.doc@hotmail.com
|
|
|
|
Evidence synthesis.
|
Reference | n | Age, year | OT, min | EBL, mL | Prostate volume, mL | LOS, day | Catheter time, day | Transfusion rate (%) | PSA, ng/mL | IPSS pre-operative | IPSS post-operative | Sotelo et al., 2008 [9] | 7 | 64.7 | 195 | 382 | 77.6 | 1.3 | 7.5 | 14.3 | 12.5 | 22 | 7.2 | Yuh et al., 2008 [23] | 3 | 76.7 | 211 | 558 | 301 | 1.3 | NR | 33 | 25.1 | 17.7 | NR | John et al., 2009 [24] | 13 | 70 | 210 | 500 | 82 | 6 | 6 | 0 | NR | NR | NR | Fareed et al., 2012 [30] | 8 | 67.2 | 228 | 584 | 78 | 6 | 15 | 0 | 15.9 | 18.2 | 4.83 | Coelho et al., 2012 [31] | 6 | 69 | 90 | 208 | 145 | 1 | 4.8 | 0 | 6.9 | 19.8 | 5.5 | Clavijo et al., 2013 [32] | 10 | 71.1 | 106 | 375 | 81 | 1 | 8.9 | NR | 5.81 | 18.8 | 1.67 | Elsamra et al., 2014 [33] | 15 | 68.7 | 189 | 290 | 110 | 8.4 | 2.6 | 0 | 10.8 | 16.2 | 4.5 | Leslie et al., 2014 [34] | 25 | 72.9 | 241 | 143 | NR | 4 | 9 | 4 | 9.4 | 23.9 | 3.5 | Stolzemburg et al., 2018 [35] | 10 | 63.1 | 122 | 228 | 102 | 8.4 | 7.4 | 0 | 7.3 | 21 | 3.4 | Castillo et al., 2016 [36] | 34 | 68 | 96 | 200 | 76 | 2.2 | 4.6 | 5.8 | 7.3 | 23.5 | 7.1 | Falavolti et al., 2017 [26] | 18 | 74.3 | 205 | 200 | 100 | 3.2 | 5.6 | 0 | NR | 25.2 | 8 | Simone et al., 2019 [37] | 12 | 63 | 150 | 250 | 78 | 3 | 7 | 8 | 5.6 | 33 | 6 | Cacciamani et al., 2018 [25] | 23 | 69.4 | 160 | 98.6 | 63.1 | 2.1 | NR | NR | 7.45 | 23.1 | NR | Wang et al., 2018 [27] | 27 | 64 | 169 | 235 | 47.5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4.2 | 25 | NR | Moschovas et al., 2020 [28] | 34 | 71 | 126 | 160 | 145 | 2 | NR | 0 | NR | 21 | 8 | Kaouk et al., 2020 [29] | 10 | 74 | 190 | 100 | 84.3 | 0.8 | 7 to 12 | 0 | NR | NR | NR |
|
Peri-operative outcomes from selected studies.
|
Reference | Technique highlight | Sotelo et al., 2008 [9] | First RASP description; transperitoneal; horizontal cystostomy. | Yuh et al., 2008 [23] | Introduction of retropubic RASP (transcapsular). | John et al., 2009 [24] | Extraperitoneal approach; balloon disection; vertical cystostomy. | Fareed et al., 2012 [30] | Early reports on SP RASP with DaVinci S?. | Coelho et al., 2012 [31] | Capsule approximation, posterior reconstruction, urethral anastomosis. | Clavijo et al., 2013 [32] | Intrafascial technique; puboprostatic attachments preservation. | Elsamra et al., 2014 [33] | Use of tenaculum by assistant surgeon in a 2nd console. | Leslie et al., 2014 [34] | Transperitoneal RASP, vertical cystostomy, stay sutures. | Stolzemburg et al., 2018 [35] | Extraperitoneal approach, 5- and 7-o'clock hemostatic stitches. | Castillo et al., 2016 [36] | 180° posterior urethro-vesical anastomosis. | Falavolti et al., 2017 [26] | Internal iliac artery clamping. | Simone et al., 2019 [37] | Urethral-sparing RASP; use of NIFI (indocyanine green). | Cacciamani et al., 2018 [25] | 360° vesico-urethral anastomosis; no posterior reconstruction. | Wang et al., 2018 [27] | Urethral-sparing RASP; ejaculation preserving. | Moschovas et al., 2020 [28] | Modified RASP; intrafascial; total excision of prostate tissue. | Kaouk et al., 2020 [29] | First SP RASP series with DaVinci SP?. |
|
RASP technical modifications.
|
|
Magnetic resonance imaging. Figs. 2A and 2B illustrate a 550 g prostate 60 days after arterial embolization; Figs. 2C and 2D illustrate prostates with big median lobes.
|
|
Intraoperative aspect of a big prostate (550 g) after arterial embolization. (A) Right prostate side and bladder wall; (B) Left prostate side and bladder wall.
|
|
Intraoperative view of a prostate with big median lobe.
|
[1] |
Irwin DE, Kopp ZS, Agatep B, Milsom I, Abrams P. Tract S, Overactive bladder, urinary incontinence and bladder outlet obstruction. BJU Int 2011; 108:1132-9.
|
[2] |
Egan KB. The epidemiology of benign prostatic hyperplasia associated with lower urinary tract symptoms: prevalence and incident rates. Urol Clin North Am 2016; 43:289-97.
|
[3] |
Wei JT, Calhoun E, Jacobsen SJ. Urologic diseases in American Project: benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 2005; 173:1256-61.
|
[4] |
Brandon Van Asseldonk BV, Barkin J, Elterman DS. Medical therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a review. Curr J Oncol 2015; 22(Suppl 1):7-17.
|
[5] |
Gratzke C, Bachmann A, Descazeaud A, Drake MJ, Madersbacher S, Mamoulakis C, et al. EAU guidelines on the assessment of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms including benign prostatic obstruction. Eur Urol 2015; 67:1099-109.
|
[6] |
Freyer PJ. A new method of performing perineal prostatectomy. BMJ 1900; 1:698-9.
|
[7] |
Millin T. The surgery of prostatic obstructions. Ir J Med Sci 1947; 22:185-9.
|
[8] |
Jean-Nicolas Cornu JN, Ahyai S, Bachmann A, de la Rosette J, Gilling P, Gratzke C, et al. A systematic review and metaanalysis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic obstruction: an update. Eur Urol 2015; 67:1066-96.
|
[9] |
Sotelo R, Clavijo R, Carmona O, Garcia A, Banda E, Miranda M, et al. Robotic simple prostatectomy. J Urol 2008; 179:513-5.
|
[10] |
Tan A, Liao C, Mo Z, Cao Y. Meta-analysis of holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate for symptomatic prostatic obstruction. Br J Surg 2007; 94:1201-8.
|
[11] |
Zhou Y, Xue B, Mohammad NA, Chen D, Sun X, Yang J, et al. Greenlight high-performance system (HPS) 120-W laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a metaanalysis of the published results of randomized controlled trials. Lasers Med Sci 2016; 31:485-95.
|
[12] |
Cetinkaya M, Onem K, Rifaioglu MM, Yalcin V. 980-Nm diode laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: randomized controlled study. J Urol 2015; 12:2355-61.
|
[13] |
S?nksen J, Barber NJ, Speakman MJ, Berges R, Wetterauer U, Greene D, et al. Prospective, randomized, multinational study of prostatic urethral lift versus transurethral resection of the prostate: 12-month results from the BPH6 study. Eur Urol 2015; 68:643-52.
|
[14] |
Gilling P, Barber N, Bidair M, Anderson P, Sutton M, Aho T, et al. Water: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial of aquablation? vs. transurethral resection of the prostate in benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 2018; 199:1252-61.
|
[15] |
McVary KT, Gange SN, Gittelman MC, Goldberg KA, Patel K, Shore ND, et al. Erectile and ejaculatory function preserved with convective water vapor energy treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: randomized controlled study. J Sex Med 2016; 13:924-33.
|
[16] |
Carnevale FC, Iscaife A, Yoshinaga EM, Moreira AM, Antunes AA, Srougi M. Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) versus original and PErFecTED prostate artery embolization (PAE) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH): preliminary results of a single center, prospective, urodynamic-controlled analysis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2016; 39:44-52.
|
[17] |
Suer E, Gokce I, Yaman O, Anafarta K, G??ü? O. Open prostatectomy is still a valid option for large prostates: a highvolume, single-center experience. Urology 2008; 72:90-4.
|
[18] |
Pokorny M, Novara G, Geurts N, Dovey Z, de Groote R, Ploumidis A, et al. Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy for treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic enlargement: surgical technique and outcomes in a high-volume robotic centre. Eur Urol 2015; 68:451-7.
|
[19] |
Gratzke C, Schlenker B, Seitz M, Karl A, Hermanek P, Lack N, et al. Complications and early postoperative outcome after open prostatectomy in patients with benign prostatic enlargement: results of a prospective multicenter study. J Urol 2007; 177:1419-22.
|
[20] |
Mariano MB, Graziottin TM, Tefilli MV. Laparoscopic prostatectomy with vascular control for benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 2002; 167:2528-9.
|
[21] |
Lucca I, Shariat SF, Hofbauer SL, Klatte T. Outcomes of minimally invasive simple prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol 2015; 33:563-70.
|
[22] |
Autorino R, Zargar H, Mariano MB, Sanchez-Salas R, Sotelo RJ, Chlosta PL, et al. Perioperative outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic simple prostatectomy: a European-American multi-institutional analysis. Eur Urol 2015; 68:86-94.
|
[23] |
Yuh B, Laungani R, Perlmutter A, Eun D, Peabody J, Mohler JL, et al. Robot-assisted Millin’s retropubic prostatectomy: case series. Can J Urol 2008; 15:4101-5.
|
[24] |
John H, Bucher C, Engel N, Fischer B, Fehr JL. Preperitoneal robotic prostate adenomectomy. Urology 2009; 73:811-5.
|
[25] |
Cacciamani G, Medina L, Ashrafi A, Landsberger H, Winter M, Mekhail P, et al. Transvesical robot-assisted simple prostatectomy with 360° circumferential reconstruction: step-bystep technique. BJU Int 2018; 122:344-8.
|
[26] |
Falavolti C, Petitti T, Buscarini M. Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy with temporary internal iliac arteries clamping: our preliminary results. Mini-invasive Surg 2017; 1:35-40.
|
[27] |
Wang P, Xia D, Ye S, Kong D, Qin J, Jing T, et al. Roboticassisted urethra-sparing simple prostatectomy via an extraperitoneal approach. Urology 2018; 119:85-90.
|
[28] |
Moschovas MC, Bhat S, Fikret O, Travis R, Vipul P. Modified simple prostatectomy: an approach to address large volumeBPH and associated prostate cancers. J Robot Surg 2020; 14:543-8.
|
[29] |
Kaouk J, Sawczyn G, Wilson C, Aminsharifi A, Fareed K, Garisto J, et al. Single-port percutaneous transvesical simple prostatectomy using the SP robotic system: initial clinical experience. Urology 2020; 141:171-3.
|
[30] |
Fareed K, Zaytoun OM, Autorino R, White WM, Crouzet S, Yakoubi R, et al. Robotic single port suprapubic transvesical enucleation of the prostate (R-STEP): initial experience. BJU Int 2012; 110:732-7.
|
[31] |
Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Sivaraman A, Palmer KJ, Orvieto MA, Rocco B, et al. Modified technique of robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy: advantages of a vesico-urethral anastomosis. BJU Int 2012; 109:426-33.
|
[32] |
Clavijo R, Carmona O, de Andrade R, Garza R, Fernandez G, Sotelo R. Robot-assisted intrafascial simple prostatectomy: novel technique. J Endourol 2013; 27:328-32.
|
[33] |
Elsamra SE, Gupta N, Ahmed H, Leavitt D, Kreshover J, Kavoussi L, et al. Robotic assisted laparoscopic simple suprapubic prostatectomydthe Smith Institute for Urology experience with an evolving technique. Asian J Urol 2014; 1:55-9.
|
[34] |
Leslie S, Abreu AL, Chopra S, Ramos P, Park D, Berger AK, et al. Transvesical robotic simple prostatectomy: initial clinical experience. Eur Urol 2014; 66:321-9.
|
[35] |
Stolzenburg JU, Kallidonis P, Kyriazis I, Kotsiris D, Ntasiotis P, Liatsikos EN. Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy by an extraperitoneal approach. J Endourol 2018; 32:S39-43. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2017.0714.
|
[36] |
Castillo O, Vidal-Mora I, Rodriguez-Carlin A, Silva A, Schatloff O, Borgna V. Modified urethrovesical anastomosis during robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: technique and results. Prostate Int 2016; 4:61-4.
|
[37] |
Simone G, Misuraca L, Anceschi U, Minisola F, Ferriero M, Guaglianone S, et al. Urethra and ejaculation preserving robotassisted simple prostatectomy: near-infrared fluorescence imaging-guided madigan technique. Eur Urol 2019; 75:492-7.
|
[38] |
Rocco B, Cozzi G, Spinelli MG, Coelho RF, Patel VR, Tewari A, et al. Posterior musculofascial reconstruction after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol 2012; 62:779-90.
|
[39] |
Johnson B, Sorokin I, Singla N, Roehrborn C, Gahan JC. Determining the learning curve for robot-assisted simple prostatectomy in surgeons familiar with robotic surgery. J Endourol 2018; 32:865-70.
|
[40] |
Shaheen A, Quinlan D. Feasibility of open simple prostatectomy with early vascular control. BJU Int 2004; 93:349-52.
|
[41] |
Remzi M, Klingler HC, Tinzl MV, Fong YK, Lodde M, Kiss B, et al. Morbidity of laparoscopic extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal radical prostatectomy verus open retropubic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2005; 48:83-9.
|
[42] |
Bostwick DG, Cooner WH, Denis L, Jones GW, Scardino PT, Murphy GP. The association of benign prostatic hyperplasia and cancer of the prostate. Cancer 1992; 70:291-301.
|
[43] |
Hammarsten J, H?gstedt B. Calculated fast-growing benign prostatic hyperplasia. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2002; 36:330-8.
|
[1] |
Gede Wirya Kusuma Duarsa,Yudit Anastasia Sari,Anak Agung Gde Oka,Kadek Budi Santosa,I Wayan Yudiana,Pande Made Wisnu Tirtayasa,Ida Bagus Putra Pramana,Yudhistira Pradnyan Kloping. Serum testosterone and prostate-specific antigen levels are major risk factors for prostatic volume increase among benign prostatic hyperplasia patients[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2021, 8(3): 289-297. |
[2] |
Marcio Covas Moschovas,Kulthe Ramesh Seetharam Bhat,Cathy Jenson,Vipul R. Patel,Gabriel Ogaya-Pinies. Robtic-assisted radical cystectomy: Literature review[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2021, 8(1): 14-19. |
[3] |
Gilberto José Rodrigues,Giuliano Betoni Guglielmetti,Marcelo Orvieto,Kulthe Ramesh Seetharam Bhat,Vipul R. Patel,Rafael Ferreira Coelho. Robot-assisted endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy: A review of current outcomes[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2021, 8(1): 20-26. |
[4] |
Brooke Sachs,Vincent Misrai,Shahin Tabatabaei,Henry H. Woo. Multicenter experience with photoselective vaporization of the prostate on men taking novel oral anticoagulants[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2020, 7(4): 340-344. |
[5] |
Paula Andrea Peña,Lynda Torres-Castellanos,Germán Patiño,Stefanía Prada,Luis Gabriel Villarraga,Nicolás Fernández. Minimally invasive nephrectomy for inflammatory renal disease[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2020, 7(4): 345-350. |
[6] |
E. Vickman Renee,E. Franco Omar,C. Moline Daniel,J. Vander Griend Donald,Thumbikat Praveen,W. Hayward Simon. The role of the androgen receptor in prostate development and benign prostatic hyperplasia: A review[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2020, 7(3): 191-202. |
[7] |
Xie Weibin,Bi Junming,Wei Qiang,Han Ping,Song Dongkui,Shi Lei,Ye Dingwei,Shen Yijun,Gou Xin,He Weiyang,Wang Shaogang,Liu Zheng,Fan Jinhai,Wu Kaijie,Chen Zhiwen,Zhou Xiaozhou,Kong Chuize,Liu Yang,Liu Chunxiao,Xu Abai,Jin Baiye,Fu Guanghou,Xue Wei,Chen Haige,Pan Tiejun,Tu Zhong,Lin Tianxin,Huang Jian. Survival after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: Multicenter comparison between minimally invasive and open approaches[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2020, 7(3): 291-300. |
[8] |
Xiaofeng Zou,Guoxi Zhang,Tianpeng Xie,Yuanhu Yuan,Rihai Xiao,Gengqing Wu,Xiaoning Wang,Hui Xu,Folin Liu,Yuting Wu,Yunfeng Liao,Quanliang Liu,Yinghao Sun,Bo Yang,Linhui Wang,Chuanliang Xu,Xiaofeng Gao. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in urology: The Chinese experience[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2020, 7(1): 1-9. |
[9] |
Giovanni Saredi,Giacomo Maria Pirola,Francesca Ambrosini,Simone Barbieri,Lorenzo Berti,Andrea Pacchetti,Domenico Iovino,Giuseppe Ietto,Letizia Libassi,Giulio Carcano. Feasibility of en bloc thulium laser enucleation of the prostate in a large case series. Are results enhanced by experience?[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2019, 6(4): 339-345. |
[10] |
Dominique Thomas,Kevin C. Zorn,Malek Meskawi,Ramy Goueli,Pierre-Alain Hueber,Lesa Deonarine,Vincent Misrai,Alexis Te,Bilal Chughtai. The role of photovaporization of the prostate in small volume benign prostatic hyperplasia and review of the literature[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2019, 6(4): 353-358. |
[11] |
Qixiang Song,Paul Abrams,Yinghao Sun. Beyond prostate, beyond surgery and beyond urology: The “3Bs” of managing non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2019, 6(2): 169-173. |
[12] |
Jie Cao,Xia Sheng,Yan Ding,Lingjuan Zhang,Xiaoying Lu. Effect of warm bladder irrigation fluid for benign prostatic hyperplasia patients on perioperative hypothermia, blood loss and shiver: A meta-analysis[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2019, 6(2): 183-191. |
[13] |
Guat Ng Lay. Botulinum toxin and benign prostatic hyperplasia[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2018, 5(1): 33-36. |
[14] |
H.Kim Eric,A.Brockman John,L.Andriole Gerald. The use of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2018, 5(1): 28-32. |
[15] |
Xu Peng,Xu Abai,Chen Binshen,Zheng Shaobo,Xu Yawen,Li Hulin,Shen Haiyan,Liu Chunxiao. Bipolar transurethral enucleation and resection of the prostate: Whether it is ready to supersede TURP?[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2018, 5(1): 48-54. |
|
|
|
|