Search Asian J Urol Advanced Search
Share 
Asian Journal of Urology, 2021, 8(1): 27-37    doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2020.09.002
Review Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Robot-assisted retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy: The state of art
Gilberto J. Rodriguesa,Giuliano B. Guglielmettia,Marcelo Orvietob,Kulthe Ramesh Seetharam Bhatc,Vipul R. Patelc,Rafael F. Coelhoa,*()
a Sao Paulo State Cancer Institute, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil
b Clínica Alemana, Santiago, Chile
c Department of Urology, AdventHealth Global Robotics Institute, Celebration, FL, United States
Download: HTML   PDF (3375KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

Objective: To perform a narrative review about the role of robot-assisted retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (R-RPLND) in the management of testicular cancer.

Methods: A PubMed search for all relevant publications regarding the R-RPLND series up until August 2019 was performed. The largest series were identified, and weighted means calculated for outcomes using the number of patients included in each study as the weighting factor.

Results: Fifty-six articles of R-RPLND were identified and eight series with more than 10 patients in each were included. The weighted mean age was 31.12 years; primary and post chemotherapy R-RPLND were performed in 50.59% and 49.41% of patients. The clinical stage was I, II and III in 47.20%, 39.57% and 13.23% of patients. A modified R-RPLND template was used in 78.02% of patients, while 21.98% underwent bilateral full template. The weighted mean node yield, operative time and estimated blood loss were, respectively, 22.15 nodes, 277.35 min and 131.94 mL. The weighted mean length of hospital stay was 2 days and antegrade ejaculation was preserved in 92.12% of patients. Major post-operative complications (Clavien III or IV) occurred in 5.34%. Positive pathological nodes were detected in 24.54%, while the recurrence free survival was 95.77% with a follow-up of 21.81 months.

Conclusion: R-RPLND has proven to be a reproducible and safe approach in experienced centers; short-term oncologic outcomes are similar to the open approach with less morbidity and shorter convalescence related to its minimal invasiveness. However, longer follow-up and new trials comparing head-to-head both techniques are expected.

Key wordsTesticular neoplasms      Lymphadenectomy      Robotic surgical procedures     
Received: 17 February 2020      Available online: 20 January 2021
Corresponding Authors: Rafael F. Coelho     E-mail: coelhouro@yahoo.com.br
Service
E-mail this article
Add to citation manager
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
Gilberto J. Rodrigues
Giuliano B. Guglielmetti
Marcelo Orvieto
Kulthe Ramesh Seetharam Bhat
Vipul R. Patel
Rafael F. Coelho
TRENDMD:   
Cite this article:   
Gilberto J. Rodrigues,Giuliano B. Guglielmetti,Marcelo Orvieto, et al. Robot-assisted retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy: The state of art[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2021, 8(1): 27-37.
URL:  
http://www.ajurology.com/EN/10.1016/j.ajur.2020.09.002     OR     http://www.ajurology.com/EN/Y2021/V8/I1/27