|
|
Definition, treatment and outcome of residual fragments in staghorn stones |
Osman Ermisa,*(),Bhaskar Somanib,Thomas Reevesb,Selcuk Guvena,Pilar Laguna Pesa,Arun Chawlac,Padmaraj Hegdec,Jean de la Rosettea
|
a Istanbul Medipol University, School of Medicine, Department of Urology, Istanbul, Turkey b University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Department of Urology, Southampton, UK c Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Department of Urology, Manipal, India |
|
|
Abstract Technological advances in minimally invasive treatment of stone disease and its integration with concomitant clinical practice are amongst the most important achievements in urology. Despite the wealth of information accumulated over the years and the richness of existing literature, the knowledge about the definition, treatment and outcomes of residual stone fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) is still insufficient. Due to the high stone load a lot of patients with staghorn stones have residual fragments (RFs) after treatment with PNL, which depends on the size of tract, definition of stone free rate (SFR), timing of evaluation and the imaging used. No consensus exists on the imaging modality or their timing in the evaluation of possible RFs. The treatment of residual stones is apparently different depending on the facilities of the department and the preference of the surgeon, which includes active surveillance, shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) or a second look PNL.
|
Received: 30 January 2019
Available online: 31 December 2019
|
Corresponding Authors:
Osman Ermis
E-mail: osermis@gmail.com
|
|
|
References | Definition of RF | Definition of SFR | Imaging modality | SFR | Al-Kohlany et al. [7] | CIRF: nonsymptomatic, nonobstructing and noninfected fragments of less than 4 mm in diameter | Completely clearances of stones were considered stone free | KUB and USS (at discharge home and during follow-up) | 49% | Zeng et al. [19] | - | The absence of any diameter RF | KUB or CT (at discharge and after auxiliary procedures if necessary) | Initial SFR: 66.4%Final SFR: 86.1% (after auxillary procedures) | Liatsikos et al. [24] | - | The absence of any diameter RF | Non-contrast CT ornephrostography (postoperative) | 87% | Netto et al. [25] | - | The absence of any diameter RF after all treatment modalities done | Non-contrast CT or KUB (afterinitial PCNL and allauxiliary procedure) | 82.3% | Desai et al. [26] | - | The absence of any diameter RF in the postoperation 30th day and following examinations | - | 56.9% | Armitage et al. [27] | - | The absence of any diameter RF | KUB, USG or CT (postoperative day 1) | 47% | Soucy et al. [28] | - | The absence of significant residual stone | Initial SFR: KUB, CT orantegrade Initial SFR: KUB, CT or antegrade nephrostography at discharge Final SFR: KUB or USS ( 3 or 6 months) | Initial SFR: 77.8%Final SFR: 90.5% (after auxillary procedures) | Qi et al. [17] | - | The absence of any diameter RF | Initial SFR: KUB and USS (3 days) Final SFR: KUB and USS (3 months) | Initial SFR: 61.6% Final SFR: 79.0% | Atmoko et al. [23] | - | The absence of any diameter RF | KUB, CT orantegradpyelografi (1 or 2 day after operation) | 62.6% |
|
Different authors presenting definitions of RF and SFR, imaging modality used and SFR outcome (%).
|
|
Illustrating stone size and location pre- and postoperative illustrating differences in SFR outcome based on imaging modality used. (A) KUB X-ray preoperative; (B) KUB X-ray postoperative; (C and D) CT postoperative. SFR, stone free rate; KUB, kidney-ureter-bladder; CT, computerized tomography.
|
[1] |
M. Desai, Y. Sun, N. Buchholz, A. Fuller, T. Matsuda, B. Matlaga , et al. Treatment selection for urolithiasis: percutaneous nephrolithomy, ureteroscopy, shock wave lithotripsy, and active monitoring. World J Urol, 35(2017), pp. 1395-1399.
|
[2] |
C.M. Johnson, D.M. Wilson, W.M. O'Fallon, R.S. Malek, L.T. Kurland. Renal stone epidemiology: a 25-year study in Rochester, Minnesota. Kidney Int, 16(1979), pp. 624-631.
|
[3] |
Türk C, Neisius A, Petrik A, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Thomas K. EAU guideline on urolithiasis. [Accessed 3 January 2019]. https://uroweb.org/wp-content/uploads/EAU-Guidelines-on-Urolithiasis-2018-large-text.pdf.
|
[4] |
S. Koga, Y. Arakaki, M. Matsuoka, C. Ohyama. Staghorn calculi-long-term results of management. Br J Urol, 68(1991), pp. 122-124.
|
[5] |
Khaitan, N.P. Gupta, A.K. Hemal, P.N. Dogra, A. Seth, M. Aron. Post-ESWL, clinically insignificant residual stones: reality or myth? Urology, 59(2002), pp. 20-24.
|
[6] |
M.M. Osman, Y. Alfano, S. Kamp, A. Haecker, P. Alken, M.S. Michel , et al. 5-year-follow-up of patients with clinically insignificant residual fragments after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. Eur Urol, 47(2005), pp. 860-864.
|
[7] |
K.M. Al-Kohlany, A.A. Shokeir, A. Mosbah, T. Mohsen, A.M. Shoma, I. Eraky, et al. Treatment of complete staghorn stones: a prospective randomized comparison of open surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol, 173(2005), pp. 469-473.
|
[8] |
G.M. Preminger, D.G. Assimos, J.E. Lingeman, S.Y. Nakada, M.S. Pearle, J.S. Wolf Jr., et al. Chapter 1: AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations. J Urol, 173(2005), pp. 1991-2000.
|
[9] |
Y. Chen, J. Feng, H. Duan, Y. Yue, C. Zhang, T. Deng, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus open surgery for surgical treatment of patients with staghorn stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 14(2019), Article e0206810, 10.1371/journal.pone.0206810.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206810
|
[10] |
Smith AD, Badlani G, Preminger G, Badlani G, Kavoussi L . Smith's textbook of endourology, 3 rd ed. Wiley-Blackwell. Chapter 58 Management of residual stone fragments, Page 662, [Introduction and definitions Part I].
|
[11] |
F. Altunrende, A. Tefekli, R.J. Stein, R. Autorino, E. Yuruk, H. Laydner , et al. Clinically insignificant residual fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: medium-term follow-up. J Endourol, 25(2011), pp. 941-945.
|
[12] |
D. Olvera-Posada, S.N. Ali, M. Dion, H. Alenezi, J.D. Denstedt, H. Razvi. Natural history of residual fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: evaluation of factors related to clinical events and intervention. Urology, 97(2016), pp. 46-50.
|
[13] |
C.M. Scoffone, C.M. Cracco, M. Cossu, S. Grande, M. Poggio, R.M. Scarpa. Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position: a new standard for percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Eur Urol, 54(2008), pp. 1393-1403.
|
[14] |
Y. Osman, A.M. Harraz, A.R. El-Nahas, B. Awad, N. El-Tabey, H. Shebel, et al. Clinically in significant residual fragments: an acceptable term in the computed tomography era? Urology, 81(2013), pp. 723-726.
|
[15] |
D. Opondo, S. Gravas, A. Joyce, M. Pearle, T. Matsuda, Y.H. Sun , et al. Standardization of patient outcomes reporting in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol, 28(2014), pp. 767-774.
|
[16] |
S. Hamamoto, T. Yasui, A. Okada, K. Taguchi, N. Kawai, R. Ando , et al. Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery for large calculi: simultaneous use of flexible ureteroscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy overcomes the disadvantageous of percutaneous nephrolithotomy monotherapy. J Endourol, 28(2014), pp. 28-33.
|
[17] |
S. Qi, L. Li, R. Liu, B. Qiao, Z. Zhang, Y. Xu. Impact of stone branch number on outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of staghorn calculi. J Endourol, 28(2014), pp. 152-157.
|
[18] |
S. Sfoungaristos, O.N. Gofrit, D. Pode, E.H. Landau, M. Duvdevani. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn stones: which nomogram can better predict postoperative outcomes? World J Urol, 34(2016), pp. 1163-1168.
|
[19] |
G. Zeng, Z. Zhao, S. Wan, Z. Mai, W. Wu, W. Zhong , et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for simple and complex renal caliceal stones: a comparative analysis of more than 10 000 cases. J Endourol, 27(2013), pp. 1203-1208.
|
[20] |
El-Assmy, A.R. El-Nahas, A.M. Harraz, Y. El Demerdash, M.M. Elsaadany, S. El-Halwagy, et al. Clinically insignificant residual fragments: is it an appropriate term in children? Urology, 86(2015), pp. 593-598.
|
[21] |
L. Chen, M.L. Sha, D. Li, J. Zhuo, C.Y. Jiang, Y.P. Zhu , et al. Treatment for residual stones using flexible ureteroscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy after the management of complex calculi with single-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Lasers Med Sci, 32(2017), pp. 649-654.
|
[22] |
J. de la Rosette, D. Assimos, M. Desai, J. Gutierrez, J. Lingeman, R. Scarpa, et al. The clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 5 803 patients. J Endourol, 25(2011), pp. 11-17.
|
[23] |
Ganpule M . DesaiFate of residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a critical analysis. J Endourol, 23(2009), pp. 399-403.
|
[24] |
E.N. Liatsikos, R. Kapoor, B. Lee, M. Jabbour, G. Barbalias, A.D. Smith. "Angular percutaneous renal access". Multiple tracts through a single incision for staghorn calculous treatment in a single session. Eur Urol, 48(2005), pp. 832-837.
|
[25] |
N.R. Netto Jr., J. Ikonomidis, O. Ikari, J.A. Claro. Comparative study of percutaneous access for staghorn calculi. Urology, 65(2005), pp. 659-662.
|
[26] |
M. Desai, A. De Lisa, B. Turna, J. Rioja, H. Walfridsson, A. D'Addessi, et al. The clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: staghorn versus nonstaghorn stones. J Endourol, 25(2011), pp. 1263-1268.
|
[27] |
J.N. Armitage, S.O. Irving, N.A. Burgess , British Association of Urological Surgeons Section of EndourologyPercutaneous nephrolithotomy in the United Kingdom: results of a prospective data registry. Eur Urol, 61(2012), pp. 1188-1193.
|
[28] |
F. Soucy, R. Ko, M. Duvdevani, L. Nott, J.D. Denstedt, H. Razvi. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn calculi: a single center's experience over 15 years. J Endourol, 23(2009), pp. 1669-1673.
|
[29] |
W. Atmoko, P. Birowo, N. Rasyid. Factors affecting stone free rate of primary percutaneous nephrolithotomy on staghorn calculi: a single center experience of 15 years. Version 2. F1000Res, 5(2016), p. 2106.
|
[30] |
B.K. Somani, M. Desai, O. Traxer, S. Lahme. Stone free rate (SFR): a new proposal for defining levels of SFR. Urolithiasis, 42(2014), p. 95.
|
[31] |
S. Rob, T. Bryant, I. Wilson, B.K. Somani. Ultra low dose, low dose and standard dose CT of the kidney, ureters, and bladder: is there a difference? Results from a systematic review of literature. Clin Radiol, 72(2017), pp. 11-15.
|
[32] |
Pietropaolo, S. Proietti, R. Geraghty, A. Skolarikos, A. Papatsoris, E. Liatsikos , et al. Trends of ‘urolithiasis: interventions, simulation and laser technology’ over the last 16 years (2000-2015) as published in the literature (PubMed): a systematic review. World J Urol, 35(2017), pp. 1651-1658.
|
[33] |
F. New, B.K. Somani. A complete world literature review of quality of life in patients with kidney stone disease. Curr Urol Rep, 17(2016), p. 88.
|
[34] |
Wright, N. Rukin, D. Smith, J. de la Rosette, B.K. Somani. ‘Mini, Ultra, Micro’ — Nomenclature and cost of these new minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) techniques. Ther Adv Urol, 8(2016), pp. 142-146.
|
[1] |
Sudharsan Balaji,Arvind Ganpule,Thomas Herrmann,Ravindra Sabnis,Mahesh Desai. Contemporary role of multi-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of complex renal calculi[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2020, 7(2): 102-109. |
[2] |
Russell S. Terry,Glenn M. Preminger. Metabolic evaluation and medical management of staghorn calculi[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2020, 7(2): 122-129. |
[3] |
Etienne Xavier Kellera,Vincent De Conincka,Steeve Doizia,Olivier Traxer. The role of ureteroscopy for treatment of staghorn calculi: A systematic review[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2020, 7(2): 110-115. |
[4] |
Xiaofeng Gao, Ziyu Fang, Chaoyue Lu, Rong Shen, Hao Dong, Yinghao Sun. Management of staghorn stones in special situations[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2020, 7(2): 130-138. |
[5] |
Nariman Gadzhiev,Vigen Malkhasyan,Gagik Akopyan,Sergei Petrov,Francis Jefferson,Zhamshid Okhunov. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn calculi: Troubleshooting and managing complications[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2020, 7(2): 139-148. |
[6] |
Jared S. Winoker,Ryan A. Chandhoke,William Atallah,Mantu Gupta. Morphometry scores: Clinical implications in the management of staghorn calculi[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2020, 7(2): 78-86. |
[7] |
lIlan Klein,Jorge Gutiérrez-Aceves. Preoperative imaging in staghorn calculi, planning and decision making in management of staghorn calculi[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2020, 7(2): 87-93. |
[8] |
Arvind P. Ganpule,M. Naveen Kumar Reddy,S.B. Sudharsan,Shaishav B. Shah,Ravindra B. Sabnis,Mahesh R. Desai. Multitract percutaneous nephrolithotomy in staghorn calculus[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2020, 7(2): 94-101. |
[9] |
Bohdan Baralo,Patrick Samson,David Hoenig,Arthur Smith. Percutaneous kidney stone surgery and radiation exposure: A review[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2020, 7(1): 10-17. |
[10] |
Guangju Ge,Zhenghui Wang,Mingchao Wang,Gonghui Li,Zuhao Xu,Yukun Wang,Shawpong Wan. Inadvertent insertion of nephrostomy tube into the renal vein following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A case report and literature review[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2020, 7(1): 64-67. |
[11] |
Derek B. Hennessey, Ned Kinnear, Gilbert Rice, David Curry, Siobhan Woolsey, Brian Duggan. Compliance in patients with dietary hyperoxaluria: A cohort study and systematic review[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2019, 6(2): 200-207. |
[12] |
Liu Yu,Chen Yuntian,Liao Banghua,Luo Deyi,Wang Kunjie,Li Hong,Zeng Guohua. Epidemiology of urolithiasis in Asia[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2018, 5(4): 205-214. |
[13] |
Carter Boyd,Kyle Wood,Dustin Whitaker,Dean G. Assimos. The influence of metabolic syndrome and its components on the development of nephrolithiasis[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2018, 5(4): 215-222. |
[14] |
Jennifer Bjazevic,Hassan Razvi*. Stones in pregnancy and pediatrics[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2018, 5(4): 223-234. |
[15] |
Matthias Beysens,Thomas O. Tailly. Ureteral stents in urolithiasis[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2018, 5(4): 274-286. |
|
|
|
|