|
|
Percutaneous kidney stone surgery and radiation exposure: A review |
Bohdan Baraloa,Patrick Samsonb,*(),David Hoenigb,Arthur Smithb
|
a Urology Department, National Pirogov Memorial Medical University, Vinnytsya, Ukraine b Department of Urology, Smith Institute for Urology, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, NY, USA |
|
|
Abstract During the past 3 decades, radiation exposure (RE) has increased drastically among patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), thus potentially causing new cases of cancer each year. The effective dose received by patients comes from pre- and post-operative computed tomography (CT) and intraoperative fluoroscopy (FL). We reviewed literature to find novel techniques and approaches that help to decrease RE of patients and personnel. We performed PubMed search using keywords percutaneous nephrolithotomy, intraoperative fluoroscopy, radiation exposure, imaging, percutaneous access, ultrasound, computed tomography, endoscopy, reconstruction, innovations, and augmented reality. Forty-four relevant articles were included in this review. As much as 20% of patients with first diagnosed urolithiasis exceed background RE level almost 17-fold. For diagnosing purposes using low-dose and ultra-low-dose CT, as well as low-dose dual energy scan protocols can be efficient ways to decrease RE while maintaining decent accuracy. Patients with urinary stones can be effectively monitored with digital tomosynthesis, ultrasound alone or ultrasound combined with plain film of the abdomen. Percutaneous access (PCA) into the kidney can be performed with reduced or even no RE, using novel PCA methods. REs from conventional imaging techniques during diagnosis and treatment increase probability of non-stochastic radiation effects. Urologists should be aware of protocols that decrease RE from CT and FL in diagnosis and management of urinary stones. Consideration of recently developed imaging modalities and PCA techniques will also aid in adherence to the “as low as reasonably achievable” principle.
|
Received: 01 March 2018
Available online: 23 May 2019
|
Corresponding Authors:
Patrick Samson
E-mail: psams13@gmail.com
|
|
|
Access technique | Mean RE/FL time during PCA | Pros | Cons | Cone beam CT-guided access and control | 9.9 mSv/- | Helps to perform puncture in patients with abnormal anatomy. Low-risk of complications | Carries higher RE and requires more time for PCA | Laser guided complex punctures with UroDyna CT | 0.0969 mSv/- | Good for patients with complex anatomy, uncertain ultrasound findings, unsuccessful FL guided punctures | Immediate pre-procedural CT (6.11 mSv) is required, which increases RE and time of procedure | The laser direct alignment radiation reduction technique | -/7.09 s | Decreases mean access FL time. Easier technique for non-experienced surgeons | Requires special equipment | Ultrasound-guided access | -/17.7 s | Helps to decrease RE during PCA, while providing high success rate of PCA | PCA time was significantly longer in ultrasound guided group | Computer-assisted ultrasonic guidance | RE was eliminated | Facilitates renal targeting regardless level of surgeon's expertise and helps to eliminate RE | Requires special equipment | Ultrasound-guided access combined with “all-seeing needle” | RE was eliminated | Eliminates RE and simultaneously allows confirmation of proper placement of the needle by direct visualization of the pelvis and calyces | Requires special equipment | Intraoperative ultrasound augmentation with preoperative MRI for PCA | RE was eliminated | Eliminates RE during the procedure, and also gives complex 3D reconstruction. Very useful in cases where X-ray exposure contraindicated, and complex visualization is required | Pre-surgical MRI with marking is required | Ultrasound-guided puncture under EMT augmentation | RE was eliminated | Improves tracking of the needle (shorter time of puncture, lower number of attempts) and eliminates RE during PCA | Requires special equipment | Direct endoscopic visualization combined with conventional FL control | RE can be potentially decreased due to better visualization | Can be used in patients with anticipated difficulties during PCA (obesity, significant stone burden, non-dilated pelvicalyceal system, nephroptosis). Does not require special equipment | FL is still main visualization approach. Requires assistant who can control ureteroscope | Direct endoscopic visualization combined with ultrasound-guided access | -/3.5 s | Helps to significantly decrease FL time. Does not require special equipment. Helps to confirm correct PCA by direct visualization | Requires assistant who can control ureteroscope | Ureteroscopy assisted PCNL with electromagnetic guidance | RE was eliminated | Potentially eliminates the need for RE. Helps to confirm correct PCA by direct visualization. Provides constant 3D monitoring through the procedure | Requires special equipment |
|
Comparative results of different access techniques.
|
[1] |
Scales Jr CD, Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS . Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur Urol 2012; 62:160-5.
|
[2] |
Litwin MS, Saigal CS . Urologic Diseases in America. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 2012. p. 314-46.
|
[3] |
Fernstr?m I, Johansson B . Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1976; 10:257-9.
|
[4] |
Ghani KR, Andonian S, Bultitude M, Desai M, Giusti G, Okhunov Z , et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: update, trends, and future directions. Eur Urol 2016; 70:382-96.
|
[5] |
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States. 2015, May 29 [Press release], https://ncrponline.org/publications/reports/ncrp-report-160.
|
[6] |
Ferrandino MN, Bagrodia A, Pierre SA, Scales Jr CD, Rampersaud E, Pearle MS , et al. Radiation exposure in the acute and short-term management of urolithiasis at 2 academic centers. J Urol 2009; 181:668-72.
|
[7] |
Neisius A, Wang AJ, Wang C, Nguyen G, Tsivian M, Kuntz NJ , et al. Radiation exposure in urology: a genitourinary catalogue for diagnostic imaging. J Urol 2013; 190:2117-23.
|
[8] |
Berrington de González A, Mahesh M, Kim KP, Bhargavan M, Lewis R, Mettler F , et al. Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med 2009; 169:2071-7.
|
[9] |
Tzou DT, Usawachintachit M, Taguchi K, Chi T . Ultrasound use in urinary stones: adapting old technology for a modern-day disease. J Endourol 2017; 31(S1):S89-94.
|
[10] |
Sternberg KM, Eisner B, Larson T, Hernandez N, Han J, Pais VM . Ultrasonography significantly overestimates stone size when compared to low-dose, noncontrast computed tomography. Urology 2016; 95:67-71.
|
[11] |
Rob S, Bryant T, Wilson I, Somani BK . Ultra-low-dose, lowdose, and standard-dose CT of the kidney, ureters, and bladder: is there a difference? Results from a systematic review of the literature. Clin Radiol 2017; 72:11-5.
|
[12] |
Dewes P, Frellesen C, Scholtz JE, Fischer S, Vogl TJ, Bauer RW , et al. Low-dose abdominal computed tomography for detection of urinary stone diseasedimpact of additional spectral shaping of the X-ray beam on image quality and dose parameters. Eur J Radiol 2016; 85:1058-62.
|
[13] |
Tenant S, Pang CL, Dissanayake P, Vardhababhuti V, Stuckey C, Gutteridge C , et al. Intra-patient comparison of reduced-dose model-based iterative reconstruction with standard-dose adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in the CT diagnosis and follow-up of urolithiasis. Eur Radiol 2017; 27:4163-72.
|
[14] |
Liu L . Model-based iterative reconstruction: a promising algorithm for today’s computed tomography imaging. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2014; 45:131-6.
|
[15] |
Wilhelm K, Schoenthaler M, Hein S, Adams F, Schlager D, Kuehhas FE , et al. Focused dual-energy CT maintains diagnostic and compositional accuracy for urolithiasis using ultralow-dose noncontrast CT. Urology 2015; 86:1097-102.
|
[16] |
Cabrera FJ, Kaplan AG, Youssef RF, Tsivian M, Shin RH, Scales CD , et al. Digital tomosynthesis: a viable alternative to noncontrast computed tomography for the follow-up of nephrolithiasis? J Endourol 2016; 30:366-70.
|
[17] |
Moesbergen TC, de Ryke RJ, Dunbar S, Wells JE, Anderson NG . Distal ureteral calculi: US follow-up. Radiology 2011; 260:575-80.
|
[18] |
Fulgham PF, Assimos DG, Pearle MS, Preminger GM . Clinical effectiveness protocols for imaging in the management of ureteral calculous disease: AUA technology assessment. J Urol 2013; 189:1203-13.
|
[19] |
Blair B, Huang G, Arnold D, Li R, Schlaifer A, Anderson K , et al. Reduced fluoroscopy protocol for percutaneous nephrostolithotomy: feasibility, outcomes and effects on fluoroscopy time. J Urol 2013; 190:2112-6.
|
[20] |
Hanna L, Walmsley BH, Devenish S, Rogers A, Keoghane SR . Limiting radiation exposure during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 2015; 29:526-30.
|
[21] |
Durutovic O, Dzamic Z, Milojevic B, Nikic P, Mimic A, Bumbasirevic U , et al. Pulsed versus continuous mode fluoroscopy during PCNL: safety and effectiveness comparison in a case series study. Urolithiasis 2016; 44:565-70.
|
[22] |
Wallace MJ, Kuo MD, Glaiberman C, Binkert CA, Orth RC, Soulez G , et al. Three-dimensional C-arm cone-beam CT: applications in the intervention al suite. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2008; 19:799-813.
|
[23] |
Roy OP, Angle JF, Jenkins AD, Schenkman NS . Cone beam computed tomography for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: initial evaluation of a new technology. J Endourol 2012; 26:814-8.
|
[24] |
Vicentini FC, Botelho LAA, Braz JLM, Almeida ES, Hissano M . Use of the Uro Dyna-CT in endourologydthe new frontier. Int Braz J Urol 2017; 43:762-5.
|
[25] |
Ritter M, Rassweiler MC, Ha¨cker A, Michel MS . Laser-guided percutaneous kidney access with the Uro Dyna-CT: first experience of three-dimensional puncture planning with an ex vivo model. World J Urol 2013; 31:1147-51.
|
[26] |
Ritter M, Rassweiler MC, Michel MS . The Uro Dyna-CT enables three-dimensional planned laser-guided complex punctures. Eur Urol 2015; 68:880-4.
|
[27] |
Khater N, Shen J, Arenas J, Keheila M, Alsyouf M, Martin JA , et al. Bench-top feasibility testing of a novel percutaneous renal access technique: the laser direct alignment radiation reduction technique (DARRT). J Endourol 2016; 30:1155-60.
|
[28] |
Chi T, Masic S, Li J, Usawaschintachit M . Ultrasound guidance for renal tract access and dilation reduces radiation exposure during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Adv Urol 2016; 2016:3840697.
|
[29] |
Basiri A, Ziaee AM, Kianian HR, Mehrabi S, Karami H, Moghaddam SM . Ultrasonographic versus fluoroscopic access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a randomized clinical trial. J Endourol 2008; 22:281-4.
|
[30] |
Skenazy JF, Mirabile G, Hruby GW, Lauer-Amold I, Gupta M, Landman J . Comparison of manual and computer assisted ultrasonic guidance for transparenchymal percutaneous renal needle placement. J Urol 2009; 181:867-71.
|
[31] |
Bader MJ, Gratzke C, Seitz M, Sharma R, Stief CG, Desai M . The "All-seeing needle": initial results of an optical puncture system confirming access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 2011; 59:1054-9.
|
[32] |
Li ZC, Li K, Zhan HL, Chen K, Gu J, Wang L . Augmenting intraoperative ultrasound with preoperative magnetic resonance planning models for percutaneous renal access. Biomed Eng Online 2012; 11:60.
|
[33] |
Rodrigues PL, Vila?a JL, Oliveira C, Cicione A, Rassweiler J, Fonseca J , et al. Collecting system percutaneous access using real-time tracking sensors: first pig model in vivo experience. J Urol 2013; 190:1932-7.
|
[34] |
Li R, Li T, Qian X, QI J, WU D, LIU J . Real-time ultrasonography-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy using SonixGPS navigation: clinical experience and practice in a single center in China. J Endourol 2015; 29:158-61.
|
[35] |
Li X, Long Q, Chen X, He D, He H . Assessment of the SonixGPS system for its application in real-time ultrasonography navigation-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of complex kidney stones. Urolithiasis 2017; 45:221-7.
|
[36] |
Chau HL, Chan HC, Li TB, Cheung MH, Lam KM, So HS . An innovative free-hand puncture technique to reduce radiation in percutaneous nephrolithotomy using ultrasound with navigation system under magnetic field: a single-center experience in Hong Kong. J Endourol 2016; 30:160-4.
|
[37] |
Khan F, Borin JF, Pearle MS, McDougall ME, Clayman RV . Endoscopically guided percutaneous renal access: "Seeing is believing". J Endourol 2006; 20:451-5.
|
[38] |
Alsyouf M, Arenas JL, Smith JC, Myklak K, Faaborg D, Jang M , et al. Direct endoscopic visualization combined with ultrasound guided access during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a feasibility study and comparison to a conventional cohort. J Urol 2016; 196:227-33.
|
[39] |
Lima E, Rodrigues PL, Mota P, Carvalho N, Dias E, Correla- Pinto J , et al. Ureteroscopy-assisted percutaneous kidney access made easy: first clinical experience with a novel navigation system using electromagnetic guidance (IDEAL Stage 1). Eur Urol 2017; 72:610-6.
|
[40] |
Harper JD, Cunitz BW, Dunmire B, Paun M, Lee F, Ross S , et al. First in human clinical trial of ultrasonic propulsion of kidney stones. J Urol 2016; 195:956-64.
|
[1] |
Fubo Wang,Chao Zhang,Fei Guo,Xia Sheng,Jin Ji,Yalong Xu,Zhi Cao,Ji Lyu,Xiaoying Lu,Bo Yang. The application of virtual reality training for anastomosis during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2021, 8(2): 204-208. |
[2] |
Russell S. Terry,Glenn M. Preminger. Metabolic evaluation and medical management of staghorn calculi[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2020, 7(2): 122-129. |
[3] |
Osman Ermis,Bhaskar Somani,Thomas Reeves,Selcuk Guven,Pilar Laguna Pes,Arun Chawla,Padmaraj Hegde,Jean de la Rosette. Definition, treatment and outcome of residual fragments in staghorn stones[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2020, 7(2): 116-121. |
[4] |
Nariman Gadzhiev,Vigen Malkhasyan,Gagik Akopyan,Sergei Petrov,Francis Jefferson,Zhamshid Okhunov. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn calculi: Troubleshooting and managing complications[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2020, 7(2): 139-148. |
[5] |
Derek B. Hennessey, Ned Kinnear, Gilbert Rice, David Curry, Siobhan Woolsey, Brian Duggan. Compliance in patients with dietary hyperoxaluria: A cohort study and systematic review[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2019, 6(2): 200-207. |
[6] |
Liu Yu,Chen Yuntian,Liao Banghua,Luo Deyi,Wang Kunjie,Li Hong,Zeng Guohua. Epidemiology of urolithiasis in Asia[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2018, 5(4): 205-214. |
[7] |
Carter Boyd,Kyle Wood,Dustin Whitaker,Dean G. Assimos. The influence of metabolic syndrome and its components on the development of nephrolithiasis[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2018, 5(4): 215-222. |
[8] |
Jennifer Bjazevic,Hassan Razvi*. Stones in pregnancy and pediatrics[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2018, 5(4): 223-234. |
[9] |
Matthias Beysens,Thomas O. Tailly. Ureteral stents in urolithiasis[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2018, 5(4): 274-286. |
[10] |
Daniel A. Wollin,Adam G. Kaplan,Glenn M. Preminger,Pietro Manuel Ferraro,Antonio Nouvenne,Andrea Tasca,Emanuele Croppi,Giovanni Gambaro,Ita P. Heilberg. Defining metabolic activity of nephrolithiasis - Appropriate evaluation and follow-up of stone formers[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2018, 5(4): 235-242. |
[11] |
Luke F. Reynolds,Tad Kroczak,Kenneth T. Pace. Indications and contraindications for shock wave lithotripsy and how to improve outcomes[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2018, 5(4): 256-263. |
[12] |
María Rodríguez-Monsalve Herrero,Steeve Doizi,Etienne Xavier Keller,Vincent De Coninck,Olivier Traxer. Retrograde intrarenal surgery: An expanding role in treatment of urolithiasis[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2018, 5(4): 264-273. |
[13] |
Allert M.de Vries*,John P.F.A.Heesakkers. Contemporary diagnostics and treatment options for female stress urinary incontinence[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2018, 5(3): 141-148. |
[14] |
Hung Jung Jae,Park Jinsung,Tae Kim Won,WookKim Hong,JoonKim Hyung,Hong Sungwoo,JoYang Hee,Chung Hong. The association of benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract stones in adult men: A retrospective multicenter study[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2018, 5(2): 118-121. |
[15] |
Vinaya Vasudevan, Patrick Samson, Arthur D. Smith, Zeph Okeke. The genetic framework for development of nephrolithiasis[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2017, 4(1): 18-26. |
|
|
|
|