|
|
Present indications and techniques of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: What the future holds? |
Itay M. Sabler(),Ioannis Katafigiotis,Ofer N. Gofrit,Mordechai Duvdevani
|
Department of Urology, Hadassah Hebrew University Hospital, Ein Karem, Jerusalem, Israel |
|
|
Abstract The purpose of the review was to present the latest updates on percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) procedure in terms of indications and evolving techniques, and to identify the advantages and disadvantages of each modality. The data for this review were collected after a thorough PubMed search in core clinical journals in English language. The key words included “PCNL” and “PNL” in combination with “indications”, “techniques”, “review” and “miniaturized PCNL”. Publications relevant to the subject were retrieved and critically reviewed. Current European and American Urology Association Nephrolithiasis Guidelines were included as well. The indications for standard PCNL have been changed through the past decade. Despite evolution of the procedure, innovations and the development of new technical approaches, the indications for miniaturized PCNL have not been standardized yet. There is a need for well-constructed randomized trials to explore the indications, complications and results for each evolving approach. A continuous reduction of tract size is not the only revolution of the last years. There is constant ongoing interest in developing new efficient miniature instruments, intracorporeal lithotripters and sophisticated tract creation methods. We can summarize that, PCNL represents a valuable well-known tool in the field of endourology. We should be open minded to future changes in surgical approaches and technological improvements.
|
Received: 01 January 2018
Published: 19 November 2018
|
Corresponding Authors:
M. Sabler Itay
E-mail: drsabler2000@yahoo.com
|
|
|
Study | Type of study | Levels of evidence | Number of patients | Objective of the study | Kruck et al. [2] | Retrospective | 3b | 482 | Mini-PCNL | De et al. [3] | Meta-analysis | 1a | 727 | PCNL, mini-PCNL, micro-PCNL | Kirac et al. [4] | Retrospective | 3b | 37 | Mini-PCNL | Prakash et al. [11] | Retrospective | 3b | 86 | PCNL | Purkait et al. [13] | Retrospective | 3b | 44 | PCNL | Waingankar et al. [17] | Review | 4 | 221 | PCNL | Srivastava et al. [18] | Retrospective | 3b | 44 | PCNL | Gücük and üyetürk [19] | Review | 4 | 259 | PCNL | Zhang et al. [20] | Meta-analysis | 1a | 2142 | PCNL | Siev et al. [22] | Retrospective | 3b | 101 | PCNL | Yuan et al. [24] | Meta-analysis | 1a | 6881 | PCNL | Derisavifard et al. [26] | Review | 4 | NA | PCNL | Hatipoglu et al. [29] | Retrospective | 3b | 200 | PCNL | Sharma et al. [30] | Review | 4 | NA | Access technique | Sorensen et al. [31] | Prospective | 3b | 18 | Ultrasound detection | Li et al. [32] | Prospective | 3b | NA | Access technique | Rodrigues et al. [33] | Review | 4 | NA | Puncture technique | Isac et al. [35] | Retrospective | 3b | 159 | Access technique | Ritter et al. [39] | Prospective | 3b | 27 | Puncture technique | Tepeler et al. [42] | Prospective | 3b | 20 | Microperc, PCNL | Gao et al. [43] | Meta-analysis | 1a | 1279 | Mini-PCNL, ultramini-PCNL, micro-PCNL | Ruhayel et al. [44] | Systematic review | 3a | NA | Mini-PCNL, PCNL | Schilling et al. [45] | Review | 4 | NA | Nomenclature proposal | Sabnis et al. [46] | Randomized controlled trial | 2b | 35 | Microperc | Wang et al. [47] | Retrospective | 3b | 216 | Mini-PCNL, PCNL | York et al. [51] | Randomized controlled trial | 2b | 201 | PCNL | El-Nahas et al. [50] | Randomized controlled trial | 2b | 70 | PCNL |
|
|
[1] |
Fernström I, Johansson B . Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A newextraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1976; 10:257e9.
pmid: 1006190
|
[2] |
Kruck S, Anastasiadis AG, Herrmann TR, Walcher U, Abdelhafez MF, Nicklas AP , et al. Minimally invasive percutaneousnephrolithotomy: an alternative to retrograde intrarenalsurgery and shockwave lithotripsy. World J Urol 2013; 31:1555e61.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-012-0962-6
pmid: 23064981
|
[3] |
De S, Autorino R, Kim FJ, Zargar H, Laydner H, Balsamo R , et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenalsurgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol2015; 67:125e37.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.07.003
pmid: 25064687
|
[4] |
Kirac M, Bozkurt Ö F, Tunc L, Guneri C, Unsal A, Biri H , et al. Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and minipercutaneousnephrolithotomy in management of lower-polerenal stones with a diameter of smaller than 15 mm. Urolithiasis2013; 41:241e6.
doi: 10.1007/s00240-013-0552-0
pmid: 23483226
|
[5] |
Weizer AZ, Springhart WP, Ekeruo WO, Matlaga BR, Tan YH, Assimos DG , et al. Ureteroscopic management of renal calculiin anomalous kidneys. Urology 2005; 65:265e9.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.09.055
pmid: 15708035
|
[6] |
Jackman SV, Docimo SG, Gadeddu JA, Bishoff JT, Kavoussi LR, Jarrett TW , et al. The “mini perc” technique: a less invasivealternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol1998; 16:371e4.
doi: 10.1007/s003450050083
pmid: 9870281
|
[7] |
De la Rosette JJ, Laguna MP, Rassweiler JJ, Conort P . Trainingin percutaneous nephrolithotomyda critical review. Eur Urol2008; 54:994e1001.
|
[8] |
Türk C, Neisius A, Petrik A, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Tepeler A , et al.EUA Nephrolithiasis Guidelines [accessed 11 June 2017 ]. .
|
[9] |
Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL, Monga M, Hassan M , NelsonCP,et al. Surgical Management of Stones: AUA/EndourologySociety Guideline [accessed 11 September 2017 .
|
[10] |
De la Rosette J, Assimos D, Desai M, Gutierrez J, Lingeman J, Scarpa R , et al. The clinical research office of the endourologicalsociety percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study:indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients. JEndourol 2011; 25:11e7.
|
[11] |
Prakash G, Sinha RJ, Jhanwar A, Bansal A, Singh V . Outcome ofpercutaneous nephrolithotomy in anomalous kidney: is itdifferent? Urol Ann 2017; 9:23e6.
doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.198836
pmid: 28216924
|
[12] |
Evans WP, Resnick MI . Horseshoe kidney and urolithiasis. JUrol 1981; 125:620e1.
|
[13] |
Purkait B, Sankhwar SN, Kumar M, Patodia M, Bansal A, Bhaskar V . Do outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy inhorseshoe kidney in children differ from adults? A singlecenterexperience. J Endourol 2016; 30:497e503.
doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0794
pmid: 26791336
|
[14] |
Rayer PP . Traitements des maladies des reins 3. Paris: Baillerepublishers; 1841. p 507. [Article in French].
|
[15] |
Timmons Jr JW, Malek RS, Hattery RR, Deweerd JH . Calycealdiverticulum. J Urol 1975; 114:6e9.
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)66945-3
pmid: 1142503
|
[16] |
Nakada SY, Streem S, Preminger GM, Wolf Jr JS, Leveillee RJ . Controversial cases in endourology. Calyceal diverticularcalculi. J Endourol 1999; 13:61e4.
doi: 10.1089/08927790050152104
pmid: 10213097
|
[17] |
Waingankar N, Hayek S, Smith AD, Okeke Z . Calyceal diverticula:a comprehensive review. Rev Urol 2014; 16:29e43.
pmid: 24791153
|
[18] |
Srivastava A, Chipde SS, Mandhani A, Kapoor RR, Ansari MS . Percutaneous management of renal calyceal diverticularstones: ten-year experience of a tertiary care center withdifferent techniques to deal with diverticula after stoneextraction. Indian J Urol 2013; 29:273e6.
doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.120091
pmid: 24235786
|
[19] |
Gücük A, üyetürk U . Usefulness of hounsfield unit and densityin the assessment and treatment of urinary stones. World JNephrol 2014; 3:282e6.
doi: 10.5527/wjn.v3.i4.282
pmid: 25374823
|
[20] |
Zhang W, Zhou T, Wu T, Gao X, Peng Y, Xu C , et al. Retrogradeintrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomyversus extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for treatment oflower pole renal stones: a meta-analysis and systematic review. J Endourol 2015; 29:745e59.
|
[21] |
de la Rosette JJ, Tsakiris P, Ferrandino MN, Elsakka AM, Rioja J, Preminger GM . Beyond prone position in percutaneousnephrolithotomy: a comprehensive review. Eur Urol 2008; 54:1262e9.
|
[22] |
Siev M, Motamedinia P, Leavitt D, Fakhoury M, Barcohana K, Hoenig D , et al. Does peak inspiratory pressure increase in theprone position? An analysis related to body mass index. J Urol2015; 194:1302e7.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.05.015
pmid: 25983193
|
[23] |
Vicentini FC, Gomes CM, Danilovic AA, Neto EA, Mazzucchi E, Srougi M . Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: current concepts. Indian J Urol 2009; 25:4e10.
|
[24] |
Yuan D, Liu Y, Rao H, Cheng T, Sun Z, Wang Y , et al. Supineversus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy forkidney calculi: a meta-analysis. J Endourol 2016; 30:754e63.
doi: 10.1007/s11255-010-9801-0
pmid: 20628815
|
[25] |
Gofrit ON, Shapiro A, Donchin Y, Bloom AI, Shenfeld OZ, Landau EH , et al. Lateral decubitus position for percutaneousnephrolithotripsy in the morbidly obese or kyphotic patient. JEndourol 2002; 16:383e6.
doi: 10.1089/089277902760261437
pmid: 12227914
|
[26] |
Derisavifard S, Hartman C, Gupta N, Hoenig D, Okeke Z, Smith A . New developments in percutaneous stone surgery. Afr J Urol 2016; 22:141e8.
doi: 10.1016/j.afju.2016.04.002
|
[27] |
El-Assmy AM, Shokeir AA, Mohsen T, El-Tabey N, El-Nahas AR, Shoma AM , et al. Renal access by urologist or radiologist forpercutaneous nephrolithotomydis it still an issue? J Urol2007; 178:916e20.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.015
pmid: 17632136
|
[28] |
Miller NL, Matlaga BR, Lingeman JE . Techniques for fluoroscopicpercutaneous renal access. J Urol 2007; 178:15e23.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.014
pmid: 17574053
|
[29] |
Hatipoglu NK, Bodakci MN, Penbegül N, Bozkurt Y, Sancaktutar AA, Atar M , et al. Monoplanar access technique forpercutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urolithiasis 2013; 41:257e63.
doi: 10.1007/s00240-013-0557-8
pmid: 23564416
|
[30] |
Sharma GR, Maheshwari PN, Sharma AG, Maheshwari RP, Heda RS, Maheshwari SP . Fluoroscopy guided percutaneousrenal access in prone position. World J Clin Cases 2015; 3:245e64.
doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v3.i3.245
pmid: 25789297
|
[31] |
Sorensen MD, Harper JD, Hsi RS, Shah AR, Dighe MK, Carter SJ . B-mode ultrasound versus color Doppler twinkling artifact indetecting kidney stones. J Endourol 2013; 27:149e53.
doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0430
pmid: 23067207
|
[32] |
Li ZC, Li K, Zhan HL, Chen K, Gu J, Wang L . Augmentingintraoperative ultrasound with preoperative magnetic resonanceplanning models for percutaneous renal access. BiomedEng Online 2012; 11:60.
doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-11-60
pmid: 3494559
|
[33] |
Rodrigues PL, Rodrigues NF, Fonseca J, Lima E, Vilaça JL . Kidney targeting and puncturing during percutaneous nephrolithotomy:recent advances and future perspectives. JEndourol 2013; 27:826e34.
doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0740
pmid: 23488637
|
[34] |
Grasso M, Lang G, Taylor FC . Flexible ureteroscopicallyassisted percutaneous renal access. Tech Urol 1995; 1:39.
pmid: 9118366
|
[35] |
Isac W, Rizkala E, Liu X, Noble M, Monga M . Endoscopic-guidedversus fluoroscopic-guided renal access for percutaneousnephrolithotomy: a comparative analysis. Urology 2013; 81:251e6.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.10.004
pmid: 23374772
|
[36] |
Bader MJ, Gratzke C, Seitz M, Sharma R, Stief CG, Desai M . The “all-seeing needle”: initial results of an optical puncturesystem confirming access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 2011; 59:1054e9.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.07.145
pmid: 21477921
|
[37] |
Kawahara T, Ito H, Terao H, Yoshida M, Ogawa T, Uemura H , et al. Ureteroscopy assisted retrograde nephrostomy: a newtechnique for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). BJU Int2012; 110:588e90.
doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10795.x
pmid: 22520110
|
[38] |
Rassweiler JJ, Müller M, Fangerau M, Klein J, Goezen AS, Pereira P , et al. iPad-assisted percutaneous access to thekidney using marker-based navigation: initial clinical experience. Eur Urol 2011; 61:628e31.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.12.024
pmid: 22209052
|
[39] |
Ritter M, Rassweiler M, Michel MS . The Uro Dyna-CT enablesthree-dimensional planned laser-guided complex punctures. Eur Urol 2015; 68:880e4.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.005
pmid: 26213364
|
[40] |
Huber J, Wegner I, Meinzer HP, Hallscheidt P, Hadaschik B, Pahernik S , et al. Navigated renal access using electromagnetictracking: an initial experience. Surg Endosc 2011; 25:1307e12.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1338-x
pmid: 20835720
|
[41] |
Simpfendörfer T, Franz A, Seitel A, Bopp N, Gasch C, Hohenfellner M , et al. Introducing a combined ultrasound andelectromagnetic tracking device for navigated sonographickidney puncture. J Urol 2017; 197:e815.
|
[42] |
Tepeler A, Akman T, Silay MS, Akcay M, Ersoz C, Kalkan S , et al. Comparison of intrarenal pelvic pressure during micropercutaneousnephrolithotomy and conventional percutaneousnephrolithotomy. Urolithiasis 2014; 42:275e9.
doi: 10.1007/s00240-014-0646-3
pmid: 24522489
|
[43] |
Gao XS, Liao BH, Chen YT, Feng SJ, Gao R, Luo DY , et al. Different tract sizes of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomyversus retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematicreview and meta-analysis. J Endourol 2017; 31:1101e10.
|
[44] |
Ruhayel Y, Tepeler A, Dabestani S , MacLennan S, Pet?ík A,Sarica K, et al. Tract sizes in miniaturized percutaneousnephrolithotomy: a systematic review from the european associationof urology urolithiasis guidelines panel. Eur Urol2017; 72:220e35.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.01.046
pmid: 28237786
|
[45] |
Schilling D, Hüsch T, Bader M, Herrmann TR, Nagele U . Nomenclature in PCNL or the Tower of Babel: a proposal for auniform terminology. World J Urol 2015; 33:1905e7.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1506-7
pmid: 25673242
|
[46] |
Sabnis RB, Ganesamoni R, Doshi A, Ganpule AP, Jagtap J, Desai MR . Micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy (microperc) vs.retrograde intrarenal surgery for themanagement of small renalcalculi: a randomized controlled trial. BJU Int 2013; 112:355e61.
doi: 10.1111/bju.12164
pmid: 23826843
|
[47] |
Wang Y, Wang Y, Hou Y, Want C . Standard-tract combined withmini-tract in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal staghorncalculi. Urol Int 2014; 92:422e6.
doi: 10.1159/000354427
pmid: 24642730
|
[48] |
Hennessey DB, Kinnear NK, Troy A, Angus D, Bolton DM, Webb DR . Mini PCNL for renal calculi: does size matter? BJUInt 2017; 119:39e46.
doi: 10.1111/bju.13839
pmid: 28544299
|
[49] |
Li X, He Z, Wu K, Li SK, Zeng G, Yuan J , et al. Chinese minimallyinvasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: the Guangzhouexperience. J Endourol 2009; 23:1693e7.
doi: 10.1089/end.2009.1537
pmid: 19747032
|
[50] |
Lowe G, Knudsen BE . Ultrasonic, pneumatic and combinationintracorporeal lithotripsy for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 2009; 23:1663e8.
doi: 10.1089/end.2009.1533
pmid: 19785552
|
[51] |
York NE, Borofsky MS, Chew BH, Dauw CA, Paterson RF, Denstedt JD , et al. Randomized controlled trial comparingthree different modalities of lithotrites for intracorporeallithotripsy in PCNL. J Endourol 2017; 31:1145e51.
doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0436
pmid: 28859485
|
[52] |
El-Nahas AR, Elshal AM, El-Tabey NA, El-Assmy AM, Shokeir AA . Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn stones: a randomizedtrial comparing high-power holmium laser versusultrasonic lithotripsy. BJU Int 2016; 118:307e12.
doi: 10.1111/bju.13418
pmid: 26779990
|
[53] |
Elhilali M, Badaan S, Ibrahim A, Andonian S . Use of mosespulse modulation technology to improve holmium laser lithotripsyoutcomes: a preclinical study. J Endourol 2017; 31:598e604.
doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0050
pmid: 5467131
|
[1] |
Guohua Zeng,Wei Zhu,Wayne Lam. Miniaturised percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Its role in the treatment of urolithiasis and our experience[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2018, 5(4): 295-302. |
[2] |
Luke F. Reynolds,Tad Kroczak,Kenneth T. Pace. Indications and contraindications for shock wave lithotripsy and how to improve outcomes[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2018, 5(4): 256-263. |
[3] |
Igor Sorokin,Margaret S. Pearle. Medical therapy for nephrolithiasis: State of the art[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2018, 5(4): 243-255. |
[4] |
Jennifer Bjazevic,Hassan Razvi*. Stones in pregnancy and pediatrics[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2018, 5(4): 223-234. |
[5] |
S.J.Chung Amanda,H.Woo Henry. Update on minimally invasive surgery and benign prostatic hyperplasia[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2018, 5(1): 22-27. |
[6] |
Vinaya Vasudevan, Patrick Samson, Arthur D. Smith, Zeph Okeke. The genetic framework for development of nephrolithiasis[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2017, 4(1): 18-26. |
[7] |
Yasser A. Noureldin, Mohamed A. Elkoushy, Sero Andonian. Does the presence of a percutaneous renal access influence fluoroscopy time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy?[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2015, 2(4): 220-223. |
[8] |
Christopher Hartman, Nikhil Gupta, David Leavitt, David Hoenig, Zeph Okeke, Arthur Smith. Advances in percutaneous stone surgery[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2015, 2(1): 26-32. |
|
|
|
|