Kirsten JC Janosek-Albright, Peter N. Schlegel, Ali A. Dabaja
1. Department of Urology, Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA;
2. Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
Abstract The last 20 years have produced developments in the treatment for patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) who were once considered to be infertile.The combination of intracytoplasmic sperm injection together with various testicular sperm retrieval techniques, including conventional testicular sperm extraction (TESE), microdissection TESE (micro-TESE) and fine needle aspiration (FNA), have revolutionized treatment for these men. In men with NOA, isolated regions of spermatogenesis within the testis are common. The goal for all types of sperm retrieval procedures is locating the focal region(s) of spermatogenesis, and harvesting the sperm for assisted reproduction. This review article explores the surgical management of men with NOA and describes all techniques that can be used for testicular sperm retrieval. A PubMed search was conducted using the key words: "sperm extraction", "NOA", "testicular FNA", "testicular mapping", "TESE", and "testicular biopsy". All articles were reviewed. Articles were included if they provided data on sperm retrieval rates. The methods for performing sperm retrieval rates and outcomes of the various techniques are outlined. Micro-TESE has a higher sperm retrieval rates with fewer postoperative complications and negative effects on testicular function compared with conventional TESE.
Jarow JP, Espeland MA, Lipshultz LI. Evaluation of the azoospermic patient. J Urol 1989;142:62-5.
[2]
Zukerman Z, Rodriguez-Rigau LJ, Weiss DB, Chowdhury AK, Smith KD, Steinberger E. Quantitative analysis of the seminiferous epithelium in human testicular biopsies, and the relation of spermatogenesis to sperm density. Fertil Steril 1978;30:448-55.
Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet 1992;340:17-8.
[5]
Ron-El R, Strassburger D, Friedler S, Komarovski D, Bern O, Soffer Y, et al. Extended sperm preparation: an alternative to testicular sperm extraction in non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod 1997;12:1222-6.
[6]
Rucker GB, Mielnik A, King P, Goldstein M, Schlegel PN. Preoperative screening for genetic abnormalities in men with nonobstructive azoospermia before testicular sperm extraction. J Urol 1998;160:2068-71.
[7]
Schlegel PN. Nonobstructive azoospermia: a revolutionary surgical approach and results. Semin Reprod Med 2009;27:165-70.
[8]
Raman JD, Schlegel PN. Aromatase inhibitors for male infertility. J Urol 2002;167:624-9.
Reifsnyder JE, Ramasamy R, Husseini J, Schlegel PN. Role of optimizing testosterone before microdissection testicular sperm extraction in men with nonobstructive azoospermia. J Urol 2012;188:532-6.
[11]
Aydos K, Unlu C, Demirel LC, Evirgen O, Tolunay O. The effect of pure FSH administration in non-obstructive azoospermic men on testicular sperm retrieval. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2003;108:54-8.
[12]
Shiraishi K, Ohmi C, Shimabukuro T, Matsuyama H. Human chorionic gonadotrophin treatment prior to microdissection testicular sperm extraction in non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod 2012;27:331-9.
[13]
Hussein A, Ozgok Y, Ross L, Rao P, Niederberger C. Optimization of spermatogenesis-regulating hormones in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia and its impact on sperm retrieval: a multicentre study. BJU Int 2013;111:E110-4.
[14]
Pavlovich CP, King P, Goldstein M, Schlegel PN.Evidence of a treatable endocrinopathy in infertile men. J Urol 2001;165:837-41.
[15]
Schlegel PN, Kaufmann J. Role of varicocelectomy in men with nonobstructive azoospermia. Fertil Steril 2004;81:1585-8.
[16]
Ramasamy R, Schlegel PN. Microdissection testicular sperm extraction: effect of prior biopsy on success of sperm retrieval. J Urol 2007;177:1447-9.
[17]
Kahraman S, Ozgür S, Alata? C, Aksoy S, Ta?demir M, Nuho?lu A, et al. Fertility with testicular sperm extraction and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in non-obstructive azoospermic men. Hum Reprod 1996;11:756-60.
[18]
Obrant KO, Persson PS. [Cytological study of the testis by aspiration biopsy in the evaluation of fertility][in German]. Urol Int 1965;20:176-89.
[19]
Turek PJ, Cha I, Ljung BM. Systematic fine-needle aspiration of the testis: correlation to biopsy and results of organ "mapping" for mature sperm in azoospermic men. Urology 1997;49:743-8.
[20]
Rosenlund B, Kvist U, Ploen L, Rozell BL, Sjoblom P, Hillensjo T. A comparison between open and percutaneous needle biopsies in men with azoospermia. Hum Reprod 1998;13:1266-71.
[21]
Ostad M, Liotta D, Ye Z, Schlegel PN. Testicular sperm extraction for nonobstructive azoospermia: results of a multibiopsy approach with optimized tissue dispersion. Urology 1998;52:692-6.
[22]
Aydos K, Demirel LC, Baltaci V, Unlu C. Enzymatic digestion plus mechanical searching improves testicular sperm retrieval in nonobstructive azoospermia cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2005;120:80-6.
[23]
Donoso P, Tournaye H, Devroey P. Which is the best sperm retrieval technique for non-obstructive azoospermia? A systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2007;13:539-49.
[24]
Amer M, Ateyah A, Hany R, Zohdy W. Prospective comparative study between microsurgical and conventional testicular sperm extraction in non-obstructive azoospermia: follow-up by serial ultrasound examinations. Hum Reprod 2000;15:653-6.
[25]
Ramasamy R, Yagan N, Schlegel PN. Structural and functional changes to the testis after conventional versus microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Urology 2005;65:1190-4.
[26]
Okada H, Dobashi M, Yamazaki T, Hara I, Fujisawa M, Arakawa S, et al. Conventional versus microdissection testicular sperm extraction for nonobstructive azoospermia. J Urol 2002;168:1063-7.
[27]
Dabaja AA, Schlegel PN. Microdissection testicular sperm extraction: an update. Asian J Androl 2013;15:35-9.
[28]
Kalsi JS, Shah P, Thum Y, Muneer A, Ralph DJ, Minhas S. Salvage mico-dissection testicular sperm extraction; outcome in men with Non obstructive azoospermia with previous failed sperm retrievals. BJU Int 2014 Sep 15. doi: 10.1111/bju.12932. [Epub ahead of print]
[29]
Tournaye H, Liu J, Nagy PZ, Camus M, Goossens A, Silber S, et al. Correlation between testicular histology and outcome after intracytoplasmic sperm injection using testicular spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 1996; 11:127-32.
[30]
Bryson CF, Ramasamy R, Sheehan M, Palermo GD, Rosenwaks Z, Schlegel PN. Severe Testicular Atrophy Does not affect the success of microdissection testicular sperm extraction. J Urol 2014; 191:175-8.
[31]
Raheem AA, Rushwan N, Garaffa G, Zacharakis E, Doshi A, Heath C, et al. Factors influencing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcome in men with azoospermia. BJU Int 2013; 112:258-64. outcome in men with azoospermia. BJU Int 2013; 112:258-64.
